The Price of Security? Border Patrol Bounty Hunting in Northern New York

Joseph Nevins

 

In the wake of Barack Obama’s re-election and as the winds of immigration reform increasingly blow across the political landscape, the mantra of “border security” is becoming louder in some quarters. In late January, for example, the so-called “Gang of Eight”—a bipartisan group of U.S. senators—announced its proposal. It insists upon “success in securing the border” before any “path to citizenship” be opened for the millions of unauthorized immigrants already present in the United States.1535

Among its champions, border security is assumed to be an unadulterated good—or at least the price “we” have to pay for “our” collective wellbeing. That price is costly for both the benighted “us”—the federal government has spent more than $200 billion dollars (in 2012 dollars) on immigration and boundary policing since 1986—and the menacing “them,” thousands of whom have perished in the borderlands since the mid-1990s.

While such costs are relatively well known, far less visible are the everyday hassles, indignities, and abuses suffered by people in the borderlands at the hands of federal immigration authorities, particularly agents of the U.S. Border Patrol (USBP). This is despite many of those victimized having done nothing wrong even by the standards of the Department of Homeland Security.

A report released last week by Families for Freedom, a Manhattan-based organization that fights deportations, and the Immigrant Rights Clinic at the New York University School of Law brings to light some of these abuses. In doing so, the report, entitled “Uncovering USBP,” reveals an ugly present, and suggests an ominous future in 1536terms of civil and human rights in the borderlands—barring a weakening of the immigration and boundary policing apparatus.

As a follow-up to a previous report, one released in November 2011, that scrutinized Border Patrol policing on Amtrak trains and Greyhound or Trailways buses, this latest one also concentrates on northern New York State. In particular, “Uncovering USBP” examines the Rochester Station of the agency’s Buffalo Sector.

The outcome of almost four years of litigation that yielded depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents, the report exposes what is essentially a bounty program—one in which agents receive bonuses for the number of people they arrest. Agents are eligible for gift cards of up to $100 for online shopping or commercial retail outlets; year-end bonuses of up to $2,500; or 40 hours of extra vacation time. In 2011 alone, the cost of these bonuses totaled almost $200,000 in the Buffalo Sector.

While there are no stated criteria for allocating the bonuses, the depositions make clear that arrest statistics are the primary performance measure used by both the Buffalo Sector and the individual Border Patrol stations within. Indeed, state the authors, the USBP “has for years demanded high arrest rates from its agents in order to justify past and future budgetary increases.” Such pressures, combined with the “newly discovered cash bonus program,” lead the authors to conclude that now “border agents have even more incentive to arrest individuals than previously believed.”

The result is that agents from the Rochester Station arrested large numbers of people in 2006-2011 (the temporal focus of the litigation) who turned out to have authorization to be in the United States. In just the one station for which the authors gathered the data, agents arrested and detained hundreds of individuals “based on little or no evidence of wrongdoing.” The arrestees included U.S. citizens, legal permanent residents, and holders of tourist, student, and work visas. People of color were grossly disproportionately represented among them.

These outcomes are a manifestation of, among other things, “an agency that has deviated from its stated mission of border security and given its agents the green light to harass and arrest individuals” in the U.S. interior, asserts the report. In this regard, the “green light” is one that enables agent abuse across the U..S-Canada borderlands, from Maine to Washington State.

As an article in The Chronicle of Higher Education reported in 2011, in a number of locales in the northern borderlands “foreign students and scholars experience fear and uncertainty every time they leave campus, pick up a friend at the bus station, or board a domestic train or flight, even when they have all their documents with them.”1537CBP officer on bus in Rochester. Credit: Will Yurman/The Chronicle of Higher Education

But it is in northern New York State where such “fear and uncertainty” is felt most palpably. Carl Jensen, the head International Services Office at the of the University Rochester, hundreds of whose students have been questioned or detained by immigration authorities, told The Chronicle that "It feels a lot like East Germany did when I visited in 1980."

It is unclear why the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) presence has proven to be particularly draconian in New York State. Nancy Morawetz, one of the authors of “Uncovering USBP” and a professor at the NYU School of Law, suggested to The Chronicle that it is the growth in the number of agents that explains it. "Basically they have nothing to do, so they've come up with a really easy way to arrest a lot of people through internal enforcement," she says

Regardless of the veracity of the statement, the underlying problem, says this latest report, “is USBP’s misguided expansion into interior enforcement,” the remedy for which is “to return USBP to its job along the border and to remove standardless incentive programs.” It would also entail, argue the authors, the creation of oversight and accountability mechanisms in relation to Border Patrol programs and practices.

 


 

Joseph Nevins teaches geography at Vassar College in Poughkeepsie, New York. Among his books are Dying to Live: A Story of U.S. Immigration in an Age of Global Apartheid (City Lights/Open Media, 2008) and Operation Gatekeeper and Beyond: The War on “Illegals” and the Remaking of the U.S.-Mexico Boundary (Routledge, 2010). For more from the Border Wars blog, visit nacla.org/blog/border-wars. Now you can follow it on Twitter @NACLABorderWars.

Comments

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Please don't fall into the trap of believing everything that is written. Especially articles written by a group who sees only black and white. I have read the article that you are so eagerly accepting as truthful and accurate and I challenge you to do your own research because in this case there are many things left out and assumed by the authors to gain support for their cause.

While you don't directly say so, you imply that the central arguments contained within the the report--it's not an article--are untrue. As I write above, the report is based on court-ordered "depositions from senior agency officials, data, and documents" from the Border Patrol itself. If, indeed, there "are many things left out and assumed by the authors" that would undermine the authors' claims, you should share those "things" with the readers of this blog. Otherwise, your accusation is simply empty rhetoric.

--Joseph Nevins

Add new comment

Filtered HTML

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Adds captions, from the title attribute, to images with one of the following classes: image-left image-right standalone-image
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <blockquote> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
2 + 0 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.

Like this article? Support our work. Subscribe or donate